|
Lee Borden
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2006, 07:13:43 AM » |
|
I have several responses as I read your post. First, and most importantly, you haven't "lost your daughter," and your saying that you have is disturbing. Make sure that you continue to spend time with both your children. Despite the choices they've made, they need both parents.
Second, states (and judges within states) vary in how they approach situations like yours, where the parents ignore the court order and then ask the court to pretend they compled. Some judges would say to Dad, "it's interesting but only interesting where you say your daughter has been living. What matters to this court is that you were ordered to pay $X per month in child support. You've paid $X-Y, so now you owe Y plus interest." Other judges would muddle through some kind of backdated adjustment of the child support. You won't know how your judge would approach it until you visit with your lawyer about it.
Even if your judge is one who wants to give Dad credit for having a child live with him, you should explore two other arguments: (1) that Dad is voluntarily underemployed and that his income should be imputed at a higher level, and (2) that his income exceeds yours even now and that therefore he should pay some child support because of the differential.
For the benefit of others reading this, let me highlight a caution from it. There's really no such thing, at least for most judges, as a "temporary" change in custody. When a child goes to live with another parent "for one year and then return home," they've really gone to live with the other parent. I'm not saying you shouldn't do that. I am saying that when you do, don't rely on any right for the arrangement to end.
|